Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Perry Boyle's avatar

This comment came in by email:

""building low income housing smack dab in the center is a ludacris use of resources when we have a bus system and Hailey/Bellevue so very close." - L. Moore

Hailey and Bellevue are now disasters financially as a consequence of being converted into SACRIFICE AREAS by the north valley with an airport which clearly needs to be relocated and a malignant growth agenda with officials and staffs replacing a legitimate development analysis and review process with "rubber-stamp" approval of every real estate development proposal. A complete absence of coherent planning from north to south in this valley for the malignant growth being accommodated by a corrupt local establsihment has destroyed this place making many working families and retirees on limited fixed incomes already operating under a cloud of financial insecurity and struggling with property taxes pay for the privilege. Such is the nature of the TOXIC GENTRIFICATION intentionally engineered by the corrupt local establishment.

Again Perry, thank you for your due diligence in exposing the PROFIT PRIVATIZED, RISK SOCIALIZED corporate welfare program unethically foisted on the community under cover of Covid.

Citizens MUST REJECT any future proposals for additional funding until the size of the MASSIVE FUTURE UNFUNDED LIABILITIES created by both the corruption and incompetence of local officials promoting this malignant growth agenda can be accurately determined."

Expand full comment
ed cummins's avatar

Perry, I think you are somewhat off base regarding the SVCO.

First and foremost, SVCO is the economic engine for the WRV. Without the vision and motivation of the three owners, both Ketchum and Hailey would have remained small, farmland support towns. There would be some outdoor recreation, mostly fishing, but certainly no significant winter sports. Employment would be minor and limited to low paying opportunities. We should all celebrate the three benevolent owners who intentionally did not develop the many open acres of land that they could have. One only need to compare SV with Aspen Ski Corp and Vail Associates developments.

Throughout the history of the resort there has been constant investment and renewal. The facilities on Baldy are the very best in the country. Both the lifts and the restaurants. Those improvements continue today. I suggest that it's the desire of the to maintain the finest facilities in the industry that drive these investments and not simply dressing up the asset for sale. We do not know the ultimate disposition of the resort, however, I truly doubt that the driving force behind these current investments is to dress the asset up for sale. Fact is, from a financial perspective it's probably a poor, unnecessary investment if the goal is truly a sale or "harvest."

I believe that the SVCO houses most of their seasonal employees in their dorms. The surrounding area provides the bulk of the employees housing, as it does with most "company towns". This means the area benefits from the employment base and opportunities - and the tax base to support the infrastructure.

The bottom line here is that the local governments have failed to keep up with the growth of the SVCO - the roads, utilities, and so on. The damage to the area, the demise of the character of Ketchum, the LOT applications are all the responsibility of the local governments. That is what is needed to change, not, in my opinion, the SVCO.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts